Saturday, January 16, 2010

Jane Roe would be rolling over in her grave if she weren't still alive

Apparently, I've been sleeping under a rock. Yes, I was paying cursory attention to the health care reform debate, but somehow one of the compromises made by the democrats completely escaped me. The House of Representatives voted to include in the health care reform bill the Stupak Amendment , which restricts coverage of abortions for millions of women, even those covered under private health insurance.

Reporters for the Huffington Post summed it up, "As drafted, the measure denied the use of federal subsidies to purchase abortion coverage in policies sold by private insurers in the new insurance exchange, except in cases of incest, rape or when the life of the mother was in danger.

But abortion foes won far stronger restrictions that would rule out abortion coverage except in those three categories in any government-sold plan. It would also ban abortion coverage in any private plan purchased by consumers receiving federal subsidies."

The Senate voted down a similar amendment in their version of the health bill, but now the bills will be combined and the House and Senate will vote on a combined bill that includes the Stupak Amendment.

Strangely, there are no proposed amendments that placed any limitations on men's health care coverage.

Personally, I'm all for funding medical research that will enable doctors to 1. Remove a fetus from a womb while keeping it alive and 2. Enable men to then carry an implanted fetus to term. Then, conservative legislators who somehow believe all women's bodies belong to them can elect to take on the pregnancies themselves.

Until this happens, though, if we want all women, even those in poverty, to have the right to comprehensive health insurance, we will have to encourage our legislators to vote for justice and equality.

4 comments:

Friar said...

Norma McCorvey, who was Jane Roe in the case, is definitely still alive and would probably not have any problem at all these days with anything that limits abortion, as she is now very active in the pro-life movement.

In 2005 she petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the original Roe v. Wade decision, and she was arrested during the U.S. Senate hearings on Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the high court for protesting the judge's pro-choice views while Senator Al Franken was speaking.

She describes some of her story in a couple of books, as well as here: http://www.leaderu.com/norma/

Jerseystitch said...

Unfortunately, biology dictates only the woman can give birth. But one has to wonder why vasectomies are so widely accepted. That is almost a double standard. Maybe we should protest vasectomies and hysterectomies.

IGGY - www.KCFreeThinkers.org said...

Stitch,

Boundaries of "biological" sex are blurred. All mammals are inherently conceived as "females" and only at a certain stage in development hormones of women flood the fetus and the differntiation happens. There are "chimeras" - men with vaginas, women with penises, "merged" twins' organs, women who have men's DNA and the other way around. There have been reported cases of men having ovaries and if I recall even wombs. I am not aware of any "pure" man or "hibrid" man who has conceived, it may have happened. I'd have to dig on it. So, biologically it is not htat unheard of.

Mammal_Mama said...

Dagney, I do think you have an awesome idea about implantation.

I wonder why this is not happening? I mean, for women who can't get pregnant naturally, such as older women who are using donor eggs?

Maybe we don't quite have the technology yet -- but I imagine we will soon. And then the abortion could be covered by the prospective couple that want to carry the baby to term.